Ảnh hưởng của quy mô lao động và ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin đến đổi mới sáng tạo của các doanh nghiệp ngành chế biến chế tạo Việt Nam
Từ khóa:
Đổi mới sáng tạo, Sản phẩm, Quy trình, Tổ chứcTóm tắt
Bài báo phân tích và đánh giá ảnh hưởng của quy mô lao động, ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin và tương tác giữa chúng đến đổi mới sáng tạo của các doanh nghiệp ngành chế biến chế tạo, bao gồm đổi mới sản phẩm, đổi mới quy trình, đổi mới tổ chức. Nghiên cứu sử dụng mô hình Probit trên dữ liệu gồm 200.059 doanh nghiệp đang hoạt động trong ngành chế biến chế tạo, được thu thập từ Tổng điều tra kinh tế năm 2021 của Tổng cục Thống kê. Kết quả nghiên cứu cho thấy: quy mô lao động và ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin (sử dụng internet, phầm mềm và hệ thống tự động trong hoạt động sản xuất kinh doanh) có ảnh hưởng tích cực đến đổi mới sáng tạo. Hơn nữa, ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin đồng thời giảm quy mô lao động hợp lý sẽ tăng hiệu quả đổi mới sáng tạo. Từ đó, tác giả đề xuất một số giải pháp và khuyến nghị chính sách nhằm thúc đẩy đổi mới sáng tạo trong các doanh nghiệp ngành chế biến chế tạo Việt Nam.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akhlaque, Asya, Ong Lopez, A. & Coste, Antoine (2017), Vietnam : Enhancing enterprise competitiveness and SME linkages – lessons from international and national experience, World Bank Group, Retrieved from 18 Nov 2023, from <https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1522057/vietnam/2205295/>.
Archibugi, D., Evangelista, R. & Simonetti, R. (1993), ‘Concentration, firm size and innovation: evidence from innovation costs’, Technovation, 15(3), 153-163.
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2003), ‘Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy’, In Granstrand, O. (eds), Economics, Law and Intellectual Property, Springer, Boston, MA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3750-9_5.
Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bartelsman, E. J., Falk, M., Hagsten, E., & Polder, M. (2019), ‘Productivity, technological innovations and broadband connectivity: firm-level evidence for ten European countries’, Eurasian Business Review, 9(1), 25-48. DOI: 10.1007/s40821-018-0113-0.
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006), ‘Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: a systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003’, Technovation, 26(5), 644-664.
Blichfeldt, H., & Faullant, R. (2021), ‘Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation: A process-industry perspective’, Technovation, 105, 102275. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.technovation.2021.102275.
Bloom, N., Garicano, L., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2014), ‘The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization’, Management Science, 60(12), 2859–2885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2013.
Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002), ‘Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339-376.
Bygstad, B., & Aanby, H. P. (2010), ‘ICT infrastructure for innovation: A case study of the enterprise service bus approach’, Information Systems Frontiers, 12(3), 257–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9169-9.
Chen, Yang, Wang, Yi, Nevo, Saggi, Benitez-Amado, Jose & Kou, Gang (2015), ‘IT capabilities and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity’, Information & Management, 52(6), 643-657. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2015.05.003.
Cohen, W. M. & Klepper, S. (1996), ‘Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78/2, 232-243.
Cuevas-Vargas, H., Estrada, S., & Larios-gómez, E. (2016), ‘The effects of ICTs as innovation facilitators for a greater business performance: Evidence from Mexico’, Procedia Computer Science, 91(Itqm), 47–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.040.
Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998), ‘Theories of Organizational Structure and Innovation Adoption: The Role of Environmental Change’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00029-5.
Expósito, A., & Sanchis-Llopis, J. A. (2019), ‘The relationship between types of innovation and SMEs’ performance: A multi-dimensional empirical assessment’, Eurasian Business Review, 9, 115-135.
Farooq, R., Vij, S. & Kaur, J. (2021), ‘Innovation orientation and its relationship with business performance: moderating role of firm size’, Measuring Business Excellence, 25(3), 328-345. DOI: 10.1108/MBE-08-2020-0117.
Galati, F., & Bigliardi, B. (2019), ‘Industry 4.0: Emerging themes and future research avenues using a text mining approach’, Computers in Industry,109, 100–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.018.
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011), ‘Effects of innovation types on firm performance’, International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 662–676.
Guo, J., Zhou, S., Chen, J., & Chen, Q. (2021), ‘How information technology capability and knowledge integration capability interact to affect business model design: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120935.
Hall, Bronwyn H; Lotti, Francesca & Mairesse, Jacques (2009), ‘Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy’, Small Business Economics, 33(1), 13–33. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8.
Hue, T.T (2019), ‘The determinants of innovation in Vietnamese manufacturing firms: an empirical analysis using a technology–organization–environment framework’, Eurasian Business Review, 9, 247–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-019-00125-w.
Kastelli, I., Dimas, P., Stamopoulos, D., & Tsakanikas, A. (2022), ‘Linking Digital Capacity to Innovation Performance: the Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity’, Journal of the Knowledge Economy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01092-w.
Li, Xiaokai, Li, Xingong & Ding, Sheng (2023), ‘How do Internet applications affect process innovation in Chinese manufacturing companies?’, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 2120045. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2120045.
Long, J. S. (1997), Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables, Vol. 7, Series: Advanced quantitative techniques, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Neirotti, P., & Pesce, D. (2019), ‘ICT-based innovation and its competitive outcome: The role of information intensity’, European Journal of Innovation Management,22(2), 383–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0039.
OECD (2005), Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, OECD Publishing.
OECD (2017), Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs in a Global and Digitalised Economy, Paris.
OECD (2018), Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.
OECD (2021), The role of online platforms in weathering the COVID-19 shock, OECD, Paris.
Otioma, Chuks (2023), ‘IT capability, organizational learning and innovation performance of firms in Kenya’, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14, 3489–3517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021- 00886-8.
Pece, A. M., Simona, O. E. O., & Salisteanu, F. (2015), ‘Innovation and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis for CEE Countries’, Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 461-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00874-6.
Quốc hội (2022), Văn bản hợp nhất số 13/VBHN-VPQH Luật Khoa học và Công nghệ, ban hành ngày 08 tháng 07 năm 2022.
Rauter, R., Globocnik, D., Perl-Vorbachc, E. & Baumgartner, R. J. (2019), ‘Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance’, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 226-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.004.
Rogers, Mark (1998), The definition and measurement of innovation, Melbourne Institute Working Paper No. 10/98, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, Parkville, VIC.
Sancho-Zamora, R; Hernández-Perlines, F; Peña-García, I; Gutiérrez-Broncano, S. (2022), ‘The Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Innovation: The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning’, International Journal of Environmental Research and. Public Health, 19(2), 842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020842.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The theory of economic development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Socialism, capitalism and democracy, Harper and Brothers, New York.
Soluk, J., Kammerlander, N., & De Massis, A. (2021), ‘Exogenous shocks and the adaptive capacity of family firms: Exploring behavioral changes and digital technologies in the COVID-19 pandemic’, R&D Management, (Special Paper), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12471.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997), ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Tushman, M. & Nadler, D. (1986), ‘Organizing for Innovation’, California Management Review, 28, 74-92.
Vaona, A., & Pianta, M. (2008), ‘Firm size and innovation in European Manufacturing’, Small Business Economics, 30, 283-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9043-9.
Vij, Sandeep & Farooq, Rayees (2016), ‘Moderating Effect of Firm Size on the Relationship between IT Orientation and Business Performance’, The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, XIV(4), 34-52.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
